Selva Racing Lab
United States
ph: 714-925-2667
selvarac
For more information about what the government is doing to automobile enthusiasts, check the Specialty Equipment Market Association Action Network (SEMA). All news here is digested from the SAN articles.
In response to complaints from SEMA and aftermarket exhaust system manufacturers, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has issued new guidelines to clarify state exhaust noise regulations for use by all interested parties. The new guidelines make clear that aftermarket exhaust modifications do not in and of themselves violate muffler noise regulations unless the modifications result in noise levels exceeding California's 95-decibel limit.
SEMA and CHP have agreed to educate police officers, consumers and the industry to ensure a clear understanding of the proper exhaust noise limits and enforcement standards. SEMA's goal is to reduce improper citations and encourage modifications that comply with the regulations. It is the responsibility of aftermarket manufacturers to design and test products to ensure they comply with the regulation. We recommend that manufacturers distribute compliance information about their products and the enclosed SEMA summaries to educate consumers about their rights and responsibilities under California's regulations. Feel free to copy and distribute the enclosed materials.
In the coming months, we will compile information on enforcement actions brought to our attention. We urge you to report to us any experiences your customers have with unfair citations. We are hopeful that the guidelines will inform police officers about proper enforcement standards and procedures; if the guidelines prove ineffective in practice, we will undertake other measurers to seek fair enforcement of the regulations.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions, email stevemac@sema.org.
Responding to complaints from SEMA and custom exhaust system manufacturers, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) has issued a new bulletin clarifying state exhaust noise regulations. The Bulletin (CHP Information Bulletin 98-100) contains the following information:
Contrary to some citations issued recently, exhaust modifications that increase noise are not automatically illegal in California. The regulations allow exhaust modifications increasing noise up to 95 decibels. The California Vehicle Code does not prohibit exhaust modifications, modified tailpipes or muffler tips which increase exhaust noise levels over that of factory-installed systems as long as noise levels do not exceed the 95-decibel limit. Because California does not provide for practical roadside testing, enforcement stops will continue to require an officer's informed evaluation. CHP advises officers to issue "Notice to Correct" (fix-it tickets) when vehicles are judged in violation of the noise standard. This procedure will give vehicle owners an opportunity to nullify the citation by presenting materials demonstrating that the vehicle complies with the 95-decibel standard. Although CHP lacks resources to verify manufacturer claims, it is aware that many custom exhausxt systems meet the 95-decibel standard. The bulletin advises that police officers consider specialty equipment documentation when evaluating exhaust systems for excessive noise, both during an enforcement stop and when clearing a ticket. California exhaust noise regulations apply statewide, prohibiting local authorities from adopting local noise limitations that differ from the state regulation. Citations issued under differing local ordinances are invalid.
CHP Information Bulletin: An Exhaust Noise Standard to Guide Enforcement Offices, Specialty Equipment Manufacturers and Consumers
The California Highway Patrol (CHP), working with manufacturers and the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA), has issued new guidelines to clarify state exhaust noise regulations. CHP Information Bulletin No. 98-100 informs CHP and local officers, industry and consumers on applicable noise limits and allowable custom exhaust modifications.
Where To Find It: The following indicates the paragraph # (e.g., Q2) in the CHP Bulletin containing key information to support specialty equipment manufacturers and consumers on legal exhaust modifications.
The Bulletin acknowledges that exhaust modifications that increase noise may be legal under California regulations and that exhaust systems which meet a 95-decibel noise limit (13 CCR 1036(d)(1)), are deemed to comply with California's modified exhaust enforcement provisions (Vehicle Code Sections 27150 and 27151). [Q2 & Q10]. The document also advises that the California Vehicle Code does not automatically prohibit modifications that increase exhaust system noise levels over that of factory-installed systems. [Q2].
Industry representatives and the CHP have pledged to educate interested parties about California's applicable noise limits and proper enforcement standards. Because current regulations do not provide for practical roadside noise testing, enforcement stops will require an officer's informed, professional evaluation. [Q2]. The Bulletin notes that CHP lacks resources to independently verify manufacturer claims, but is aware there are custom systems that meet the noise levels specified in 1036(d)(1), CCR 13. An officer may consider specialty equipment manufacturer documentation in evaluating an exhaust system for excessive noise, both during an enforcement stop and when clearing a ticket pursuant to a "Notice to Correct" citation (Vehicle Code Section 40610(b)). [Q13].
The following summarizes the Bulletin's guidelines with regard to custom exhaust systems and enforcement of California's noise regulations:
Exhaust Noise Limits: California regulations contain a number of sections specifying permissible vehicle noise levels. The Bulletin advises that passenger car exhaust systems [Q9] that comply with the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR are deemed to comply with Vehicle Code enforcement Sections 27150 and 27151, governing mufflers and exhaust system modifications. [Q10]. The exhaust noise provisions in 1036(d)(1) establish a limit of 95 dB(A) measured 20 inches from the exhaust pipe outlet with the engine operating in neutral, at a specified speed typically between 3000 and 5000 rpm (see regulations for details). [Q9]. Exhaust system modifications are permitted to increase noise above the level of original factory installed systems as long as the 95-decibel limit is not exceeded. [Q10].
Statewide Noise Standard: The Bulletin advises that Section 21 of the Vehicle Code makes the Code applicable and uniform throughout the state, prohibiting local authorities from adopting additional noise limitations, unless expressly authorized. Citations issued under any such local ordinances are therefore invalid. [Q12]. Modified Exhaust Systems: A custom, replacement or modified tailpipe or muffler tip does not automatically constitute a violation of Vehicle Code Section 27151. In general, exhaust system piping, tubing, fittings, cosmetic tips or other passive devices placed behind the muffler have minimal impact on exhaust system sound levels. [Q4]. There are no regulations that require configurations or minimum dimensions for mufflers. A vehicle which does not visually appear to be equipped with a muffler, but does not emit excessive noise, should be deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151. [Q4].
"Fix-it" Ticket: Concerning enforcement action on excessive noise, the Bulletin recommends using CHP 281 "Notice to Correct" or checking the Dismissable Violation "Yes" box on CHP 215, "Notice to Appear (Arrest Citation)" unless disqualifying conditions listed in Section 40610(b) are present. [Q14]. This procedure will give vehicle owners an opportunity to present materials demonstrating that the vehicle complies with the 95dB(A) standard and seek to have the citation nullified.
Excessive Noise Enforcement Passenger Vehicles, Light Trucks and Motorcycles
The California Highway Patrol (CHP), Commercial Vehicle Section (CVS), has received many inquiries about excessive noise emitted by passenger vehicles, light trucks and motorcycles. Enforcement personnel and the public have inquired regarding enforcement of the Vehicle Code (VC) sections pertaining to excessive noise emitted by these vehicles.
Excessive noise is primarily a nuisance issue rather than a safety concern, and determination of excessive noise is subjective. For this reason, enforcement personnel are to exercise sound professional judgment in making a determination of violation. The following guidelines and attached question and answer sheet (Attachment A) provide guidance to enforcement personnel regarding appropriate enforcement procedures.
Enforcement Guidelines
The only drivers who should be cited are those whose vehicles:
1. Are not equipped with a muffler;
2. Clearly emit an offensive, harsh, excessive noise, or;
3. Have a clearly defective exhaust system (holes, leaks, etc.).
Clearing Citations
When clearing excessive noise citations issued by the CHP or allied agencies, personnel are to consider exhaust systems in compliance if they incorporate a reasonably effective muffler, do not emit an offensive, harsh, excessive noise, and appear to be in good repair. ATTACHMENT A
Q1: Doesn't the VC require a muffler on every vehicle?
Yes. Section 27150 VC requires that every motor vehicle subject to registration be equipped with an adequate muffler. There are no exceptions — all vehicles must be equipped with a muffler, as defined in Section 425 VC. A turbocharger is not considered a muffler.
Q2: Aren't all exhaust system modifications prohibited?
No. Section 27151 VC prohibits the modification of the exhaust system to amplify or increase the noise emitted by the vehicle, making the vehicle not in compliance with Section 27150 VC or exceeding the noise limits established in Sections 27201-27206 VC. Section 27151 VC does not prohibit all modifications to an exhaust system. It also does not prohibit all modifications that increase the noise level of the exhaust system over that of the original, factory-installed exhaust system (as it did until 1980). It only prohibits modifications that result in a noise level higher than those specified in Sections 27201-27206 VC. Accurately determining compliance with Sections 27201-27206 VC for enforcement purposes is generally impractical. Enforcement personnel must make an informed professional evaluation to determine if excessive noise statutes are being violated.
Q3: Do I have to actually listen to a vehicle to cite it for a violation of either Section 27150 or 27151?
Yes. Drivers of vehicles should not be cited for violation of either Section 27150 or 27151 VC unless the officer has personally listened to the vehicle in operation. This can be either under actual driving conditions or with the vehicle stationary and the engine running. Even if the officer has inspected the exhaust system and does not see a muffler present, the officer should listen to the vehicle. The purpose of this is to be sure that the exhaust system does not incorporate internally baffled pipes or other components that meet the definition of a muffler. There are no specifications which state required configurations or minimum dimensions for mufflers. A vehicle that does not visually appear to be equipped with a muffler, but does not emit excessive noise, should be deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151 VC.
Q4: Does an aftermarket, replacement or modified tailpipe or muffler tip constitute a violation of Section 27151 VC?
No. Section 27151 VC prohibits the modification of exhaust systems to amplify or increase noise. The officer would have to establish that the modification increased the noise emitted by the vehicle by listening to the exhaust. In general, exhaust system piping, tubing, fittings, cosmetic tips or other passive devices placed behind the muffler have minimal impact on exhaust system sound levels.
Q5: Since Section 27150 requires that the muffler prevent excessive and unusual noise, can the driver of a vehicle be cited for violation of Section 27150 if it emits a sound different than the original factory installed muffler?
No. The prohibition against unusual noise refers to noises that are unusual for motor vehicles. Noise that may be unusual for a particular make or model of vehicle, but which is not necessarily unusual for other motor vehicles, should not be considered in violation, provided the noise is not excessive.
Q6: Aren't all modified exhaust systems unlawful under pollution control laws?
No. Current pollution control laws regarding aftermarket exhaust systems are quite complex, but do permit the installation of a variety of aftermarket and "exempt" systems. Due to the complexity of modern pollution control systems and the laws governing them, the CHP does not provide technical training in this area. Enforcement of pollution control laws is the responsibility of the Bureau of Automotive Repair through the "Smog Check" program.
Q7: What are the noise levels specified in Sections 27201-27206 VC? Can these be used to cite loud vehicles?
No. Section 27200 VC prohibits the sale of new motor vehicles that exceed the noise limits specified in these Sections. The specified noise limits (80 dB(A) (decibels) for all new cars, pickup trucks, vans and motorcycles apply only to new motor vehicles, under full throttle acceleration tests, measured 50 feet from the test vehicle, as specified in Sections 1040-1044, 1046 and 1047, Title 13, California Code of Regulations (13 CCR). These noise levels and the specified test methods apply to manufacturers and new car dealers only, for new vehicle certification purposes, and may not be used for enforcement purposes against vehicles being operated on public roadways. The CHP is not aware of any significant violation of Section 27200 VC by vehicle manufacturers or dealers.
Q8: What are the noise levels specified in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC and how can they be enforced?
Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC specify noise standards for vehicles operating on the highway (in-use vehicles), and are intended for use in actual traffic conditions. The limits of Section 23130 apply under all conditions of grade, load, acceleration and deceleration. The lower limits of Section 23130.5 apply only to relatively level roadways and under conditions of relatively constant speed. They specifically do not apply to areas of congested traffic that require noticeable acceleration or deceleration, or within 200 feet of an official traffic control device or change in grade. Although these sections were intended for use in actual traffic conditions, the complexities of noise testing require the testing be conducted in a relatively large open area free of other vehicles and large sound-reflecting objects. This makes in-use vehicle noise testing in most developed areas impractical, where noise complaints are most likely to occur. The CHP does not currently provide either the instrumentation or training necessary to conduct vehicle noise testing. Enforcement using Section 27150 or 27151 VC is usually more appropriate and effective.
Q9: What is the exhaust noise test specified in 13 CCR? Can this be used for enforcement?
Sections 1030-1036, 13 CCR, were intended to be used by Licensed Muffler Certification Stations as a means of determining if an exhaust system met the requirements of the Muffler Certification Program (when those programs were operational). They specify testing procedures for motor vehicle exhaust noise alone (as opposed to total vehicle noise). This procedure specifies a limit of 95 dB(A) measured 20 inches from the exhaust pipe outlet with the engine operating in neutral, typically at a speed of 3000-5000 rpm. (For comparison, a modern rotary lawn mower with a 5-horsepower Briggs & Stratton engine typically emits approximately 93 dB(A) at the same distance at full speed under no load.) It applies only to passenger vehicles. It does not apply to motorcycles or to vehicles over 6000 pounds gross weight.
Q10: Can this test be used in enforcement?
Not readily. Although much simpler than the test methods specified in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC, this test method still requires some technical expertise and a means to determine both the speed (rpm) of the engine under test (tachometer) and the rpm at which maximum horsepower of the engine is developed (information which may not always be readily available), as well as a sound level meter. It is not intended for roadside noise testing. The CHP does not currently provide either the instrumentation or training necessary to conduct exhaust noise testing. This test is useful, however, for determining if an aftermarket or performance exhaust system complies with VC requirements. It should be noted that the 95 dB(A) level, because it is intended as a simple "go-no-go" type of test, may permit exhaust noise somewhat higher than those permitted under Sections 27201-27206 VC. An exhaust system that complies with the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR, is deemed to comply with Sections 27150 and 27151 VC.
Q11: What happened to the Muffler Certification and the Licensed Muffler Certification Station Programs?
Funding for both programs was terminated in 1979. There are currently no Official Muffler Certification Stations, no listing of certified mufflers and no formal mechanism in place to conduct objective vehicle or exhaust noise testing.
Q12: Can local authorities enact or enforce more strict ordinances regarding vehicle noise?
No. Section 21 VC makes the VC applicable and uniform throughout the state, and prohibits local authorities from enacting or enforcing any ordinance on the matters covered by the VC unless expressly authorized to do so. In-use vehicle noise is addressed in Sections 23130 and 23130.5 VC. There is no provision in the VC that permits local authorities to adopt additional noise limitations. Consequently, citations issued under such ordinances are invalid.
Q13: Some aftermarket exhaust systems include documentation that the system has been tested and found to meet the requirements of Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR. Are those legal?
The CHP does not have the resources to independently verify manufacturer's claims, but is aware that some aftermarket exhaust systems do meet the noise levels specified in Section 1036(d)(1), 13 CCR. An officer may consider such documentation in evaluating an exhaust system for excessive noise, both during the issuance of a citation and when clearing a citation pursuant to Section 40610(b) VC.
Q14: What type of enforcement action should be taken against vehicles emitting excessive noise?
Providing none of the disqualifying conditions listed in Section 40610(b) are present, the use of the CHP 281, "Notice to Correct," or checking the Dismissable Violation "Yes" box on the CHP 215, "Notice to Appear (Arrest Citation)," would be appropriate for these violations.
We invite anyone with more information, in law enforcement or in the automotive industry to contact us with any updates and information that may be helpful to our readers and customers. We always do our best to work with law enforcement as well as educate our customers on what is legal or illegal for use on the street.
I started this page as a means to help educate both my customers and friends on what applies to legal exhausts. It all started one day several years ago when I was stopped by a Traffic officer while I was driving my Nissan s13. He stated that he heard my exhaust and decided to pull me over since it was so loud. Heres the thing, I heard the car with the loud ricey exhaust he thought was me, I even saw it. It was ablack Honda Civic and he was passing right beside me on the left when the officer merged next to me on my right. Being a car enthusiast, yes that little Honda got my attention with its loud muffler. After the officer stopped me then approched me, he even performed a little drama for me. He came up to my window and said, "Oh man, do you know why I stopped you"? I told him I knew it wasnt for speeding. With emphasis in his voice and a bit of head shaking body language he said, "that muffler of yours is sooooo friggen loud, I just couldnt let that pass"! I grinned respectfully, amused at his theatrics, and explained that I am very aware that loud mufflers are a problem, especially with Japanese imports. That I happened to know that my car in particular was metered at only 85db. Well below the maximum allowed for the state. He said, "well, I dont need to check it with a meter to issue you a citation. I just need to decide its loud and thats it". I asked him if hed like me to start the vehicle again so he could be sure it was mine he heard, I assured him what he thought he heard had to be another car. That maybe he mistook mine simply for the shiny polished exhaust tip that he could see. He did not care and told me NOT to start the car, as he would determine it a as a sign of me trying to flee the scene(even though he had my license and registration in his hand already). He issued me a citation for CVC 27151. A modified exhaust. I lastly tried to explain to him that CVC 27151 says that no one may modify an exhaust louder than 95db. He said " Im only giving you a cite for a modified exhaust. You may not modify your exhaust". Ok, I didnt want to argue with him and have him start getting mad and smacking my tail light with his night stick and then writing me for the broken tail light(just kidding, cops dont do that, its only in the old movies that this happens). After he was done, I then promtly drove to the Station where the officer was assigned. I asked the desk officer if he could come sign off the "fix it" ticket, and he said "yes". When he came out, he noticed the shiny new condition of the muffler and tip under the car. He then said "wow, what did you do, go get a whole new exhaust? It looks nice". He then asked me to start it up so he could hear it. I did and he said, nice job, looks good and sounds ok. He went inside the office, put a stamp on it and then signed it. I paid my fee for him to do this and he gave me my receipt. Now, feeling somewhat cheated, because it was the same car and the same exhaust and one officer felt it so necessary to cite me for the exhaust, then his coworker only ten minutes later deemed it "nice" and thought it sounded good. I asked to speak to the Supervisor about the matter. A Supervising lieutenant came out and I explained the above story to him. He did explain that it was not necessary for an officer in the field to "know" if a muffler is in violation, but his judgement was enough. He also explained it was the same judgement that led the "sign off" officer to deem it ok. He also said as far as he knew, there are no such db meters in service at any police agency to verify exact sound levels. That its only common sense and judgement that verifies these violations. I told him it seems like a racket to get fees out of people. He said its just the way things are. I decided then to look more into this cause. Being a member of SEMA, I am suprised that I didnt find out about the information available on this subject sooner. So that you fans and customers may know the facts, heres a bit about the car I was driving. Then read the information in the main part of the page. You will be suprised!
This car was equipped with an aftermarket exhaust, installed at our muffler shop. It was more or less within the factory specifications as far as apperance. No fancy huge chrome pipe hanging low behind the car. Something that looked tasteful and close to original. It had a catalytic converter, a midpipe resonator, and a Magnaflow Muffler in the factory position(so it looked pretty much factory). The exception being, in stead of the factory 55mm (2 1/8th") piping, we upgraded to 2 1/2' Mandrel bent piping and a polished stainless steel muffler and tip. This slightly larger piping with its mandrel bends and muffler setup allows better flow of exhaust and gives the engine better fuel economy and performance. It does give the exhaust a slightly louder, deeper tone, but is in no way a "race car" exhaust nor is it a loud setup like the little rice rocket Hondas that you see teenagers driving around. It was designed to perform and still allow me to hear my AM talk radio on the factory radio at freeway speeds. Second on that. Those of you who know I also do fabrications for Movies and TV, I had one of the sound guys actually measure the exhaust noise level at 3500 rpm. It came to 85db. The maxumum for cars in Ca is 95db.
For the record, here are some comparisons to go by.
This issue of "legal exhausts" comes up more often than any other when dealing with CHP and Police issued "Fix It" tickets. I pride myself on keeping in compliance with the law when modifyling the cars that I drive on the street. I have had other "run ins' with various police agencies regarding the equipment on my car since the above listed incident, usually with the same outcome. Not always did the officer see my side of things. Even when I tried to explain my knowledge on this subject and how I go to the extreme efforts to make my vehicles comply.
This is not a "bash on the police" page, nor is it to point out about unfair enforcement(that does happen sometimes). Its just to bring to light what information is out there and what you can do about it if you are unfairly cited. If law enforcement officers that read this, please understand that we as car enthusiasts, just love our cars and a good number of us do our best to comply with the regulations. Please take the time to judge us on that merit. Loud mufflers, street racing, loud stereos, reckless drivers and REAL equipment violations, really tick us good guys off too. So do keep up the good work. I do know, your job is very difficult. When you guys come in off duty and I install those lift kits, lowering kits, performance parts, tinted windows, and yes, LOUD exhausts on your personal vehicles, you tell me your work stories! =)
My experience is that if you are polite and genuine when explianing why you think you are not in violation of the exhaust law, an officer just may see your side and decide that you may not be in need of that "fix It" ticket.
Selva Racing Lab
United States
ph: 714-925-2667
selvarac